International Journal of Empirical Research Methods

ISSN NO : 2995-6110

The International Journal of Empirical Research Methods is dedicated to promoting and advancing empirical research methodologies across various disciplines. This journal aims to provide a platform for researchers, scholars, educators, and practitioners to share insights, methodologies, and findings that contribute to the improvement of empirical research practices and the enhancement of evidence-based decision-making.

Submit Your Article Editorial Board
  • 459
    Views
  • 0
    CrossRef citations to date

Linguistic Errors In Written Discourse

1 Doctor Of Philosophy In English-Major In Language, Associate Professor V, Biliran Province State University Naval, Biliran,Philippines

Volume 1

Issue 2

Page: [119 - 140]

Published Online: December 20, 2023

Download Full Article ()
Creative Commons

  • Abstract

    This Study Generally Aimed To Determine The Linguistic Errors Of Grade 11 Students In Biliran Province State University-Laboratory High School (BiPSU-LHS) In Their Written Discourse, SY: 2021-2022. Utilizing The Descriptive-Correlational Research Design, This Study Elicited Data From The 33 Students Of BiPSU-LHS. Findings Revealed That Most Grade 11 Senior High School Students In BiPSU-LHS Spent 1-3 Hours In Watching English Videos Per Week. On The Other Hand, Most Of The Grade 11 Senior High School Students In BiPSU-LHS Only Spent 15 Minutes To 1 Hour In Reading English Materials Per Week. Moreover, The Most Common Syntactic Error Committed By The Grade 11 Students In The Written Discourse Was The Use Of ‘Wrong Or Missing Prepositions; Most Common Morphological Error Committed By The Grade 11 Students In The Written Discourse Was The Use Of ‘Contraction;’ And Most Common Technical Errors Committed By The Grade 11 Students In The Written Discourse Was Poor Punctuation. Hence, There Is A Significant Relationship Between The Profile Of The Grade 11 Senior High School Students And Their Syntactic Errors, Morphological Errors, And Technical Errors Committed. Based On The Overall Observation And Analysis Of The Data Gathered, The Researcher Concluded That The Grade 11 Students In Biliran Division During The School Year 2021-2022 Have Committed Linguistic Errors In Their Written Discourse, Such As: Syntactic, Morphological, And Technical Categories.

    Keywords: Linguistic Morphological Descriptive-Correlational BiPSU-LHS Committed Contraction

  • Figures

    Figure Image

  • References

      • [1]Ahmadvand, M. (2008).Analyzing errors of Iranian EFL learners in their written productions. Retrieved March 27, 2009, from http://moslem17.googlepapers. com/AnalysingerrorsofIranianEFLlearners. pdf
      • [2]Asad Javaid (Author), 2017, Error Analysis of English Essays written by Students of Southern Punjab, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/ 425071
      • [3]Bataineh, R. F. (2005). Jordanian undergraduate EFL students’ errors in the use of the indefinite article. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1),56-76.
      • [4]Bond, Z. S. (1999). Morphological Errors in Casual Conversation. Department of Linguistics, Ohio University. Brain and Language 68, 144-150. Article ID brln.1999.2071, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 6 / brln.1999.2071
      • [5]Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by Principles: Interactive language teaching methodology. New York: Prentice Hall Regents.
      • [6]Chen, H. C. (1998). A contrastive analysis of the language errors made by the Chinese students of English as a second/ foreign language. Journal of Wu-Feng Applied Linguistics, 6, 224- 237.
      • [7]Chen, H. C. (2000). Error Analysis of some features of English article usage. Journal of Wu-Feng Applied Linguistics, 8, 282-296.
      • [8]Chen, L. L. (2006). The effect of L1 and CAI on grammar learning: An Error Analysis of Taiwanese beginning EFL learners’ English essays. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 1-19.
      • [9]Collins, L. (2007). L1 differences and L2 similarities: Teaching verb tenses in English [Electronic version]. ELT Journal, 61(4), 295-304. Retrieved December 29, 2007, from http://proquest.umi/pqdweb?- did=1338974651&sid=18&Fmt=2& clentld=80892&RQT=309&vnAMEPQD https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm048
      • [10]Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL, 5, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/ iral.1967.5.1-4.161
      • [11]Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.
      • [12]Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 161-169. Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics. Harmonds worth: penguin. Corder, S.P. (1974). Error Analysis, In Allen, J.L.P. and Corder, S.P. (1974). Techniques in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Corder, S.P. (1976). The Significance of Learners Errors. 1RAL, 5, 161-170. Corder, S.P. (1978). Simple Codes and the Source of the Second Language Learners Initial Heuristic Hypothesis. Studies in Second Acquisition. 1, 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000067X
      • [13]Dulay, C., & Burt, K. (1974). Error and strategies in child second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585536
      • [14]Dulay, H.C. Burt, M.K. and Kreshen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press
      • [15]Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. London: Oxford University Press.
      • [16]Fang, Y. C. (1999). Teaching English verb tenses to Chinese EFL students. Journal of Kuen-Shan Institute of Technology, 2, 119-123.
      • [17]Fries, C. C. (1949). The Chicago Investigation. Language Learning, 2, 89-99. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1949. tb01157.x
      • [18]Gayo and Widodo (2018). An Analysis of Morphological and Syntactical Errors on the English Writing of Junior High School Indonesian Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 58-70, April 2018. https://doi.org/10.26803/ ijlter.17.4.4 https://doi.org/10.26803/ ijlter.17.4.4
      • [19]Ghadessy, M. (1980). Implications of Error Analysis for second/foreign language acquisition. Language Teaching, 189(2), 3-104.
      • [20]Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (London: Pearson Education Limited, 1983), 138.
      • [21]Khansir, A, A. (2008). Place of Error Analysis in Language Teaching. INDIAN LINGUSTICS. 69,195-202.
      • [22]P. Porras, U. G. (2014). Common Errors in Writing Among First Year College Students. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2, 30-45. Retrieved from https:// ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/ AJELP/article/view/1098
      • [23]Süheyla A, and Özgür Y. Lexical errors in elementary level EFL learners’ compositions. ScienceDirect. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5299-5303. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2010.03.864
      • [24]Vedrana Mihalicek and Christina Wilson (Eds.) 2011. Language Files: Materials for an Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 196

  • Article Metrics

    Views

    459

  • Copyright and Permissions

    At Guinness Press, authors retain the copyright for all articles published in our journals. These articles are licensed under the open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, granting free access for reading and download. Additionally, the original published version must be appropriately cited when reusing or quoting the article. These terms ensure widespread accessibility while ensuring proper attribution to the authors.

    All content published by Guinness Press is safeguarded by international copyright and intellectual property regulations. We kindly request that you honor these protections when utilizing our materials.

    For further information, please contact us at info@guinnesspress.org.